🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an event that started out as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass functions where Black people are remunerated to address Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in February, but also in October in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since those days, giving reduced attention to the accounts of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the observance is observed is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a instructive case in how co-option leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how important it is to rethink Black History Month more than the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the summer we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels emboldened to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, far-right parties are growing in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the US, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A effort to erase Black history and narrative from the records is in progress. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how little it can be impactful if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the situation of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is needed. An academic expert, a prof at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a urge to just discontinue events including Black History Month entirely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an period that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not avoid politics, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is basic knowledge of the bygone era when it ignores the present reality of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Institutions who mark it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to minor insults, but confronted with the threats that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and responsive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.