🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts about the remarks delivered by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's victory over Taylor Fritz during the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, the commentator is from the US – and sports often encourage nationalism. Some letdown would have been understandable. Rather, he brought up the ongoing drought of American men at the majors: not one of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone love a narrative, me too. But come on. Suppose the American defeated the legend for the initial occasion, force of nature the Spanish star was waiting in the next round, whom he has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And had he someway survived that, it would have been title holder the Italian, against whom the American had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven major titles (plus Alcaraz went on to defeat a tired Serbian in the next round). Fritz said in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually liked his draw, because it presented the opportunity to beat the three best competitors in the sport back-to-back. He is well within his right to aim for the achievement; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match who else in their right mind had the lack of American champions in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the only thing between her and sustained success

The American, 28, is ranked fourth in the world entering this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his last six encounters over No 3 the German with increasing ease. It's likely he might claim that position for himself in the future. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of ranking points away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and powerful strength on both front side and reverse side are sufficiently enough to defeat the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. Against the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is frequently overmatched. The past few seasons has witnessed the interesting rise of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and grace of smaller men. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His footwork is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was dictating, and playing a drop shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That serves as a quite harsh restriction on his potential.

The American has achieved a several dramatic, improbable improvements over the years. Early on of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months later, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly surged up to No 4 – and maintained the spot. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the ongoing slump of US male players lifting grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best advancement to the All England Club last four in July.

Fritz’s performance in that very quarter-final should have been enough of an sign. The Serbian won in four rounds, a win that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the very end, when the American had saved a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the exchanges, with Fritz earning numerous opportunities to break. But the champion rescued break point after break point, extending the streak to the point of agony. When Fritz finally did convert a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately played a terrible service game to lose his own serve once more; the Serbian had drawn him into a battle secondary to the real battle and compelled him to use excessive effort to win it. Down set points in the last game, his first serve sailed to heaven. He prolonged the contest twice on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, just a result of needing to hit too many second serves.

The contest was quite compelling evidence that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of the Serbian, who lost to the Spaniard in the next round and never particularly appeared like he thought he could win. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has acquired enough experience and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the drop-off. The problem is those who were anticipating Fritz to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an asset to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in press conferences, more so than virtually everyone on the men's tour except for Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not only express his emotions or the tactic he felt determined a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the blame for America not spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, maybe they can divide that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably think about it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed a journalist in June of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact extremely improbable for everybody else. {